
WHY USE A PROFESSIONAL SEARCH FIRM LIKE GLS? |
|
|
State-of-the-art resources
- When performing our most comprehensive trademark searches, we access more than 2500
separate sources of information. Many of these sources are accessed through CD-ROMS or
on-line services. Some are trade journals or books in paper form. Much of our research is
conducted in U.S. Government libraries which contain important information not available
through any other source. To effectively use these resources, hours of training and
practice are required. Our staff spends hours each week looking for new sources of
trademark information. |
|
|
Information is as current as
possible - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) makes data available to
private vendors who, in turn, produce computer databases containing Federal trademark
information. These computer
databases are missing information on as many as 60,000 recently-filed trademark
applications and hundreds of thousands cancelled or abandoned marks. In addition, numerous errors or omissions have been noted in the older data.
For this reason, a truly complete trademark search must include a search of the Official
Library of the USPTO including the records found in the 24-hour box. GLS is
the only major trademark search firm that routinely searches both a computerized database
of Federal trademark records as well as the records of the USPTO Library including all
24-hour box records. |
|
|
Know-how - Our
staff averages more than 18 years experience in trademark research and has performed
thousands of searches. In the subjective world of trademarks this experience can be
invaluable. Concepts such as dilution, family of marks,
related goods and services and phonetic similarity must be
understood in order to perform a proper trademark search. Through years of interaction
with USPTO Examiners and from our review of thousands of trademark files we have come to
understand these sophisticated principles, thereby minimizing the possibility of a later
problem. |
|
|
Price - The
resources GLS uses to perform a search and the training required to effectively use them
could not be duplicated for less than $2,000,000. However, a comprehensive search is
performed for as little as $315. |
|
|
Speed - Trademark
searches are usually completed within 48 hours and a verbal report rendered by collect
telephone call. A 24-hour Rush® and a 4-hour SuperRush® service are also
available. |

What kind of trademark search should I do? |
|
|
We are frequently asked to recommend which of our many trademark search
options is appropriate given certain circumstances. We do not recommend search
levels. While it is sometimes obvious that a particular search is not relevant to a given
situation, more often than not the appropriate level of search is determined by the level
of risk one is willing to assume and under what budget constraints the research must be
performed. The primary goal of the trademark search is to identify any prior use of a
similar name for related goods or services. Generally, this goal is best met through the
most thorough search. |
|
|
While the most thorough search can cost in excess of $500, the most frequently
requested search is our Package 2 with Internet which costs $315. This
search is also most equivalent to the full searches offered by other major trademark
search firms. |
|
|
An important decision regarding the advisability of performing an extensive trademark
search was rendered April 14, 1996 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in
the case of International Star Class Yacht Racing v. Tommy Hilfiger (38 USPQ2d). In this
case Hilfiger was found potentially liable for damages because they did not perform a
comprehensive search, despite their attorneys advice that they should. The following
excerpts from that decision may be helpful when determining what level of search is
appropriate in a particular case: |
|
|
Hilfigers choice not to perform a full search under these
circumstances reminds us of two of the famous trio of monkeys who, by covering their eyes
and ears, neither saw nor heard any evil. Such willful ignorance should not provide a
means by which Hilfiger can evade its obligations under trademark law.
|
|
|
The district court stated that the trademark search conducted by Hilfiger
prior to its use of ISCYRAs STAR CLASS mark was of federal and state
marks. In fact, the search was limited solely to registered or applied-for federal
trademarks; despite its attorneys advice that a wider search be conducted, Hilfiger
did not do one until after ISCYRA filed its suit.
|
|
|
The district court relied on Hilfigers limited first search as proof that
Hilfiger did not engage in a deceptive commercial practice or otherwise act in
bad faith in using ISCYRAs mark. We are not convinced, however, that such a limited
search should exonerate Hilfiger, particularly when Hilfiger ignored the specific advice
of its attorneys to search more thoroughly.
|

How is GLS different from other search firms? |
|
|
GLS Differs From Most Other Search Firms In Many Ways: |
|
|
|
¨ GLS is the only major trademark search firm that routinely searches both a
computerized database of Federal trademark records as well as the records of the USPTO
Library including all 24-hour box records. |
|
|
|
¨ GLS Corporate Name Search covers all 50 states. |
|
|
|
¨ GLS normal trademark search turnaround is 48 hours with a verbal report rendered by
phone. Many firms charge extra for 48 hour turnaround and some take as long as a week to
complete a search. |
|
|
|
¨ GLS is in Arlington, Virginia, where consultation with examiners and guidance from
other US Patent and Trademark Office officials is available when conducting trademark
research. |